DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NR00268-14
5 June 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC)
memo 5420 Pers-836/037 of 10 Apr 2014, a copy of which was
provided to you on 1 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. You
had 30 days to respond, but failed to do so. Therefore, your
case was presented to the Board as Les
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. Therefore, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such |
that more favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in
mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
Docket No.NROO268-14
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
Sper S i ome
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1266 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO1266-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR105 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official | naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0103 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Docket No.NRO0268-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0215 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) 5420 Ser 91/026 of 5 Mar 2014, a Copy of which was provided to you on i May 2014, and which is now enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROO215-14 official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3184 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yegulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0411 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, - regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No,.NRO0411-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6869 14
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1600 RcT of 5 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014 and again on 5 June 2014 to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR865 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board: Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7111 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were also provided an opportunity to respond within 30 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.